Appearance
Operationalizing in Modulos
Principle-based governance becomes credible when it produces an audit-ready trail: clear requirements, executed controls, linked evidence, and decisions that can be reviewed later.
Recommended project structure
Most organizations use:
- One organization project to coordinate shared governance artifacts (policy, templates, decision gates, shared control library).
- AI system projects for system-specific execution (evaluations, evidence, approvals, monitoring signals).
Most organizations only need one organization project to coordinate their organization-wide work. Multiple organization projects are mainly useful for multinational or multi-entity groups that need separate governance boundaries.
Where in Modulos
Project → Requirementsfor structured obligationsProject → Controlsfor execution and reviewProject → Evidencefor artifactsProject → Testingfor evaluation signals
Minimum viable “ethical AI pack” (per AI system)
Principle-based governance becomes actionable when each AI system has, at minimum:
- scope statement (intended use, users, impact context)
- data map (where data comes from, where it flows, where it is stored)
- evaluation plan (what you test, thresholds, cadence, owners)
- human oversight and escalation workflow (when humans intervene)
- transparency and user guidance (what you disclose and how users should interpret outputs)
- risk decisions (treat / accept) with an approval record
A sequence that works
1
Define scope and principles
Make it explicit which systems and decisions are in scope
2
Translate principles into controls
Choose controls that prevent and detect principle violations
3
Attach evidence continuously
Link artifacts to controls as they are produced
4
Review and approve
Use reviews to create a traceable governance narrative
5
Monitor signals
Use tests and monitoring outputs to keep governance current
Evidence linking (diagram)
Evidence should attach to the smallest meaningful claim and be reusable across controls and principles.
Evidence
Control Components
Controls
model_validation.pdf
Component A
Component B
Component C
Component D
Component E
CTRL-001Model Validation
CTRL-002Data Quality
Same evidence reused across controls
Attach evidence to the smallest meaningful claim.
Measurement and remediation (diagram)
Turn “ethics” into continuous signals: evaluate, detect drift, remediate, and re-verify.
Scheduled run
Runs on schedule (e.g., daily)
Evaluation
1
Fetch latest datapoint
2
metric < threshold3
Emit result
Passed
Failed
Error
Tests evaluate the most recent signal available in the window.
Continuous remediation
1
Detect
Failed or error result
2
Triage
Data issue vs real drift
3
Fix
Change system or control implementation
4
Record
Update evidence and audit trail
5
Re-verify
Re-run test or monitor
When tests are linked to controls, failures route to control owners and keep governance aligned with reality.
Exports (diagram)
Exports create point-in-time packages for stakeholders and internal audit.
Project PDF export
Top controls (PDF exports)
Evidence files (attachments)
Key assets (Markdown exports)
Audit pack
Exports are snapshots. Keep scope stable before exporting.
Integrated Management System (IMS): ISO/IEC 42001 + ISO/IEC 27001
Many organizations run principle-based AI governance through an Integrated Management System:
- ISO/IEC 42001 provides the management-system backbone (roles, audits, continual improvement).
- ISO/IEC 27001 provides the security governance baseline (access control, incident handling, supplier governance).
This supports reuse: one control execution and evidence set can support multiple frameworks.
See: ISO/IEC 42001 and ISO/IEC 27001.
Related pages
Principles
Translate UAE AI Ethics principles into controls and evidence
Governance operating model
Requirements → controls → evidence → reviews
Testing
Evaluations as continuous governance signals
Disclaimer
This page is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice.